[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly do
From: |
Phil Holmes |
Subject: |
Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Feb 2015 14:19:25 -0000 |
----- Original Message -----
From: "Masamichi HOSODA" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Cc: <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>;
<address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2015 2:59 AM
Subject: Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and
time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version
Therefore, in this branch,
https://github.com/trueroad/gub/tree/gcc-4.9
I've succeed GUB's ``make lilypond''.
All lilypond installers have been built by gcc-4.9.2.
In darwin-x86 (Intel Mac):
lilypond installer and lilypond work fine.
Correct PDF is generated.
In darwin-ppc (PowerPC Mac):
I can't prepare PowerPC Mac. Therefore, it is untested.
It would be necessary to wait for user feedback
from testers who have a PowerPC Mac, as you say.
In other environments
(mingw (Windows), linux-64, linux-x86, linux-ppc, freebsd-64,
freebsd-x86):
I've tested lilypond installer and lilypond, again. Then, they work fine.
Correct PDF is generated.
It should be noted that, in order to build on the branch,
it is necessary to the new freebsd-runtime file.
https://github.com/trueroad/gub/commit/d402f1f437dc646facfb8f54db49ee0546f7d83f
The file can be made by the following information.
https://github.com/trueroad/gub/blob/d402f1f437dc646facfb8f54db49ee0546f7d83f/gub/freebsd.py#L28
Or I may mail the file.
In addition, my GUB environment is Ubuntu 14.04 LTS 64bit.
I've cloned this git repo and swapped to the gcc-4.9.2 branch and run make
bootstrap. This is on Ubuntu 14.04 32 bit running in a virtual machine. I
get an error as follows:
Output from make:
building package: tools::p7zip
*** Stage: download (p7zip, tools)
*** Stage: untar (p7zip, tools)
*** Stage: patch (p7zip, tools)
*** Stage: shadow (p7zip, tools)
*** Stage: compile (p7zip, tools)
Command barfed: cd
/home/gub/NewGub/gub/target/tools/build/p7zip-9.20.1.src.all && make -j16
Output from the p7zip logfile:
*** Stage: compile (p7zip, tools)
invoking cd /home/gub/NewGub/gub/target/tools/build/p7zip-9.20.1.src.all &&
make -j16
mkdir -p bin
make -C CPP/7zip/Bundles/Alone all
make[1]: Entering directory
`/home/gub/NewGub/gub/target/tools/build/p7zip-9.20.1.src.all/CPP/7zip/Bundles/Alone'
g++ -O -pipe -s -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -DNDEBUG -D_REENTRANT
-DENV_UNIX -D_7ZIP_LARGE_PAGES -DBREAK_HANDLER -DUNICODE -D_UNICODE -c -I.
-I../../../myWindows -I../../../ -I../../../include_windows
../../../myWindows/myGetTickCount.cpp
make[1]: g++: Command not found
make[1]: *** [myGetTickCount.o] Error 127
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/home/gub/NewGub/gub/target/tools/build/p7zip-9.20.1.src.all/CPP/7zip/Bundles/Alone'
make: *** [7za] Error 2
Command barfed: cd
/home/gub/NewGub/gub/target/tools/build/p7zip-9.20.1.src.all && make -j16
Can anyone help with what the problem is here?
--
Phil Holmes
- time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Masamichi Hosoda, 2015/02/19
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Masamichi Hosoda, 2015/02/19
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, David Kastrup, 2015/02/19
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Masamichi HOSODA, 2015/02/20
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, David Kastrup, 2015/02/20
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Masamichi HOSODA, 2015/02/21
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly andtime-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Trevor Daniels, 2015/02/22
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly andtime-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Masamichi HOSODA, 2015/02/22
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version,
Phil Holmes <=
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Masamichi HOSODA, 2015/02/22
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Phil Holmes, 2015/02/22
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, David Kastrup, 2015/02/22
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2015/02/22
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Phil Holmes, 2015/02/22
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Masamichi HOSODA, 2015/02/22
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Phil Holmes, 2015/02/23
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Masamichi HOSODA, 2015/02/23
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Phil Holmes, 2015/02/23
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Masamichi HOSODA, 2015/02/24