[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly do
From: |
Masamichi HOSODA |
Subject: |
Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Feb 2015 23:35:55 +0900 (JST) |
> I've cloned this git repo and swapped to the gcc-4.9.2 branch and run
> make bootstrap. This is on Ubuntu 14.04 32 bit running in a virtual
> machine. I get an error as follows:
>
> Output from make:
>
> building package: tools::p7zip
> *** Stage: download (p7zip, tools)
> *** Stage: untar (p7zip, tools)
> *** Stage: patch (p7zip, tools)
> *** Stage: shadow (p7zip, tools)
> *** Stage: compile (p7zip, tools)
> Command barfed: cd
> /home/gub/NewGub/gub/target/tools/build/p7zip-9.20.1.src.all && make
> -j16
>
> Output from the p7zip logfile:
>
> *** Stage: compile (p7zip, tools)
> invoking cd
> /home/gub/NewGub/gub/target/tools/build/p7zip-9.20.1.src.all && make
> -j16
> mkdir -p bin
> make -C CPP/7zip/Bundles/Alone all
> make[1]: Entering directory
> `/home/gub/NewGub/gub/target/tools/build/p7zip-9.20.1.src.all/CPP/7zip/Bundles/Alone'
> g++ -O -pipe -s -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -DNDEBUG
> -D_REENTRANT -DENV_UNIX -D_7ZIP_LARGE_PAGES -DBREAK_HANDLER -DUNICODE
> -D_UNICODE -c -I. -I../../../myWindows -I../../../
> -I../../../include_windows ../../../myWindows/myGetTickCount.cpp
> make[1]: g++: Command not found
> make[1]: *** [myGetTickCount.o] Error 127
> make[1]: Leaving directory
> `/home/gub/NewGub/gub/target/tools/build/p7zip-9.20.1.src.all/CPP/7zip/Bundles/Alone'
> make: *** [7za] Error 2
> Command barfed: cd
> /home/gub/NewGub/gub/target/tools/build/p7zip-9.20.1.src.all && make
> -j16
>
> Can anyone help with what the problem is here?
Does your Ubuntu have g++?
If not, please try the following command.
$ sudo apt-get install g++
- time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Masamichi Hosoda, 2015/02/19
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Masamichi Hosoda, 2015/02/19
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, David Kastrup, 2015/02/19
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Masamichi HOSODA, 2015/02/20
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, David Kastrup, 2015/02/20
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Masamichi HOSODA, 2015/02/21
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly andtime-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Trevor Daniels, 2015/02/22
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly andtime-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Masamichi HOSODA, 2015/02/22
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Phil Holmes, 2015/02/22
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version,
Masamichi HOSODA <=
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Phil Holmes, 2015/02/22
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, David Kastrup, 2015/02/22
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2015/02/22
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Phil Holmes, 2015/02/22
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Masamichi HOSODA, 2015/02/22
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Phil Holmes, 2015/02/23
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Masamichi HOSODA, 2015/02/23
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Phil Holmes, 2015/02/23
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Masamichi HOSODA, 2015/02/24
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Phil Holmes, 2015/02/24