bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The built-in template satb.ly fails in 2.19.16


From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: The built-in template satb.ly fails in 2.19.16
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 08:28:28 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux)

"Trevor Daniels" <address@hidden> writes:

> I've just noticed that the examples of using the built-in template, satb.ly, 
> in the Learning Manual, see
> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/learning/built_002din-templates
> are not correct in 2.19.16.  They were (and still are) fine when using 
> 2.19.15 with the same template.
>
> The problem may be associated with one of the macros:
>
> #(defmacro lyrics-if-defined (name voice . optionals)
>   (let ((above (if (pair? optionals) (car optionals) #f)))

The last two lines are just

#(defmacro* lyrics-if-defined (name voice #:optional above)

of course accompanied by removing the matching ) along with the
replaced (let (.

>     (if (defined? name)
>       `(make-music 'ContextSpeccedMusic
>   'create-new #t
>   'context-type 'Lyrics
>   'property-operations ',(if above `((assign alignAboveContext ,above)) '())
The last line could just be

,@(if above
       `(property-operations ((assign alignAboveContext ,above)))
       '())

which avoids setting property-operations at all when unneeded.
>   'element (make-music 'LyricCombineMusic
>      'associated-context ,voice
>      'element ,name))
>       #{#})))
>
> Does anyone recognise any changes in 2.19.16 which might have affected this 
> macro?
> (There have been minor changes to this in current master, but both fail the 
> same way.)

Pretty likely issue 2010
<URL:https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2010>.

I think it requires associated voices to either be in the same << >>
block as their lyrics.  Or something like that (if they are not
accompanied by any non-associated context in the << >> I think that's
also ok).

-- 
David Kastrup



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]