Re: missing/empty files

[Dan Eble]

On Aug 13, 2015, at 09:36 , Simon Albrecht <address@hidden> wrote:
> Am 01.08.2015 um 19:35 schrieb Dan Eble:
>> add a variant of \include which does nothing if the file does not exist 
>> (eliminating one reason to have empty files in the first place)
[…]
> surely we would want \include to complain if there has been a typo and it 
> should actually refer to an existing file. Since it’s hardly possible for 
> Lily to decide about the user’s intentions here, we might perhaps provide 
> another function with the behaviour you describe

That is what I had in mind when I wrote “a variant of \include”.

Regards,
— 
Dan