Re: autoBeaming and \set measurePosition

[Trevor Daniels]

Simon Albrecht wrote Thursday, August 20, 2015 1:11 AM

> I don’t quite know what I’m supposed to think of this: With 3/4, there 
> is no beam between the third and fourth quavers. It doesn’t happen with 
> -1/4, 0, 1/4, or 2/4. Doesn’t seem like this is going to appear in any 
> realistic scenario. Just ignore it?

Automatic beams which are created using beamExceptions are
triggered when the beam end points are passed.  Skipping the
end point like this means beam creation is not triggered.

I think just ignore it.  If anyone wants to do this it's easy to add a manual
beam.

Trevor