[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ISSUE 4578] Regtest "dynamics-broken-hairpin.ly"
From: |
Simon Albrecht |
Subject: |
[ISSUE 4578] Regtest "dynamics-broken-hairpin.ly" |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:31:23 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 |
ID: 4578
STATUS: Accepted
SUMMARY: Regtest "dynamics-broken-hairpin.ly" is self-contradictory
TYPE: Maintainability
LABELS:
OWNER:
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%% start message body %%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
The regtest "dynamics-broken-hairpin.ly" has some contradictions within itself.
The description says:
\header{
texidoc = "Broken crescendi should be open on one side."
}
but the code reads
\relative {
c''1 \< \break c1\! \> \break c1\!
}
so each hairpin actually ends before line break and there are no broken
hairpins.
To match the regtest title, the code should read
\relative {
c''1 \< \break
c
c\> \break
c
c\!
}
(output attached)
– but then the ‘inner’ broken parts are open to both sides, as they should
be. So this should be described as
\header {
texidoc = "When a hairpin is broken, the broken parts should be open at the
‘breaking point’."
}
So, whatever this regtest was designed for, either it needs a clearer
description matching its original intent or different code with a new
description.
Best regards, Simon
dynamics-broken-hairpin.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [ISSUE 4578] Regtest "dynamics-broken-hairpin.ly",
Simon Albrecht <=