[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
inconsistent handling of articulations with slurs
From: |
Martin Tarenskeen |
Subject: |
inconsistent handling of articulations with slurs |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Aug 2015 12:55:14 +0200 (CEST) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.20 (LFD 67 2015-01-07) |
Hi,
Try to compile the following example:
%%%%
\version "2.19.25"
\relative {
d''-.( d-. d-. d-.)
d-_( d-_ d-_ d-_)
d--( d-- d-- d--)
d-^( d-^ d-^ d-^)
d-+( d-+ d-+ d-+)
d-!( d-! d-! d-!)
d->( d-> d-> d->)
\break
\override Slur.outside-staff-priority = #500
d-.( d-. d-. d-.)
d-_( d-_ d-_ d-_)
d--( d-- d-- d--)
d-^( d-^ d-^ d-^)
d-+( d-+ d-+ d-+)
d-!( d-! d-! d-!)
d->( d-> d-> d->)
}
%%%%
Why are the articulations in bars 2, 7, 9, 14 treated differently? It seems
they are aligned with the slurs instead of the notes. Should I forward this to
bug-lilypond?
See also attachment for additional strangeness.
--
MT
slurs-and-articulation.ly
Description: Text document
- inconsistent handling of articulations with slurs,
Martin Tarenskeen <=