[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Allura at SF is ready
From: |
Trevor Daniels |
Subject: |
Re: Allura at SF is ready |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Aug 2015 13:27:53 +0100 |
Colin Campbell wrote Monday, August 31, 2015 1:03 PM
> On 2015-08-31 02:57 AM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>> James Lowe wrote Monday, August 31, 2015 9:29 AM
>>
>>> @Trevor
>>>
>>> Assuming that you eventually start the migration, I assume you'll tell
>>> the group and we'd best hold off updating SF until it is completed (so
>>> that we don't interfere with the migration)?
>> Yes, that would be sensible. It should take little more than two days,
>> assuming no glitches or gotchas, as only one import should be required (not
>> the two needed when migrating from GC). To be sure of the migration state I
>> would disable updating during the migration proper anyway.
>> _______________________________________________
>
> I had started to catch up on verifying issues, as there is a bit of a
> backlog. Shall I carry on until Trevor starts the final migration, or
> pause until after the migration is complete?
> BTW, it turns out that SF ID and display name are separate values, so
> for the record: "John Zebedee" and "Colin Campbell" are the same person.
I'd prefer you to continue. All your changes should migrate correctly.
Trevor
- Re: Allura at SF is ready, (continued)
- Re: Allura at SF is ready, Benkő Pál, 2015/08/28
- Re: Allura at SF is ready, Simon Albrecht, 2015/08/28
- Re: Allura at SF is ready, James, 2015/08/30
- Re: Allura at SF is ready, Trevor Daniels, 2015/08/30
- Re: Allura at SF is ready, James, 2015/08/30
- Re: Allura at SF is ready, Trevor Daniels, 2015/08/30
- Re: Allura at SF is ready, James Lowe, 2015/08/31
- Re: Allura at SF is ready, Trevor Daniels, 2015/08/31
- Re: Allura at SF is ready, Colin Campbell, 2015/08/31
- Re: Allura at SF is ready,
Trevor Daniels <=