bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 2.19.31 doesn't build the docu


From: Thomas Spuhler
Subject: Re: 2.19.31 doesn't build the docu
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 07:55:32 -0700
User-agent: KMail/4.14.5 (Linux/4.1.12-server-1.mga5; KDE/4.14.5; x86_64; ; )

On Wednesday, November 11, 2015 01:45:45 PM James wrote:
> Thomas,
> 
> On 10/11/15 21:23, Thomas Spuhler wrote:
> > On Tuesday, November 10, 2015 10:15:22 PM Thomas Morley wrote:
> >> 2015-11-10 21:40 GMT+01:00 Thomas Spuhler <address@hidden>:
> >>> On Tuesday, November 10, 2015 06:20:24 PM you wrote:
> >>>> Thomas,
> >>>> 
> >>>> On 10/11/15 17:42, Thomas Spuhler wrote:
> >>>>> I just tried to build 2.19.31 but it failed in the docu section. I
> >>>>> don't
> >>>>> get much info about the error.
> >>>>> This is about all I can see:
> >>>>> langdefs.py: warning: lilypond-doc gettext domain not found.
> >>>>> mkdir -p out
> >>>>> touch out/ly-snippets.dep
> >>>>> cd ./out &&
> >>>>> /home/spuhler/MageiaSVN/lilypond/BUILD/lilypond-2.19.31/scripts/build/
> >>>>> o
> >>>>> ut/
> >>>>> run- and-check
> >>>>> "/home/spuhler/MageiaSVN/lilypond/BUILD/lilypond-2.19.31/out/bin/lilyp
> >>>>> o
> >>>>> nd
> >>>>> -- verbose
> >>>>> /home/spuhler/MageiaSVN/lilypond/BUILD/lilypond-2.19.31/ly/generate-
> >>>>> documentation" "generate-documentation.log"
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Please check the logfile generate-documentation.log for errors
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> GNUmakefile:295: recipe for target 'out/internals.texi' failed
> >>>>> make[1]: *** [out/internals.texi] Error 1
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> see build log
> >>>>> http://pkgsubmit.mageia.org/uploads/failure/cauldron/core/release/2015
> >>>>> 1
> >>>>> 110
> >>>>> 150343.spuhler.valstar.12034/log/lilypond-2.19.31-1.mga6/build.0.20151
> >>>>> 1
> >>>>> 101
> >>>>> 50405.log
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 2.19.30 builds fine
> >>>> 
> >>>> Did you clean your tree for 2.19.30 before you built 2.19.31?
> >>>> 
> >>>> Remember that we check in to staging and as long as we can make, make
> >>>> check (after a make test-baseline) AND a make doc then it gets pushed
> >>>> to
> >>>> the master tree.
> >>>> 
> >>>> I have built doc for 2.19.31 for the last two patch submissions
> >>>> (yesterday) so I am pretty certain it is OK and perhaps your tree is
> >>>> dirty.
> >>>> 
> >>>> I don't know how you build but assuming you make a build dir and make
> >>>> an
> >>>> 'out of tree build' can you rm your build, and perhaps run
> >>>> 
> >>>> ./autogen.sh && make distclean
> >>>> 
> >>>> and then try again?
> >>>> 
> >>>> Also it says to check the file '
> >>>> 
> >>>> generate-documentation.log
> >>>> 
> >>>> and while the logs are not always obvious - the documentation build
> >>>> process is quite complex - the files that get reported as more useful
> >>>> than what is sent to the console.
> >>>> 
> >>>> James
> >>> 
> >>> Hi James:
> >>> It's a build system for our distro (Mageia.org) and a similar on my
> >>> local
> >>> box. The tree is automatically cleaned, reps. deleted before the build.
> >>> I
> >>> cannot find a generate-documentation.log file in the build dir.
> >>> 
> >>> The build part of the spec file looks
> >>> 
> >>> BTW we are using guile-2.0.11 since guile 1.8 will soon be gone. (next
> >>> time it will not build on the Builds Server.) But so did we 2.19.30
> >> 
> >> Hi Thomas,
> >> 
> >> not sure, but your problem may be caused by a recent patch of mine,
> >> using define*-public and an optional agument.
> >> Which is broken in guilev2.
> >> 
> >> A correction is already on review.
> >> 
> >> If this is indeed the problem, it will be cured soon.
> > 
> > Nice. Hopefully this is it. AS I said 2.19.30 builds
> 
> Doesn't the 'configure' script print out a message telling you that you
> are using an 'incompatible' version of Guile when it goes through its
> checks?
> 
> James

It does when I run the config manually. There is a way to get around it.
If it >2.19.30 doesn't build the doc anymore with guile2 then we may just will 
not distribute the documentation package.

-- 
Best regards
Thomas Spuhler

All of my e-mails have a valid digital signature
ID 60114E63

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]