Re: Unnecessary bad beam warning

[Palmer Ralph]

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Simon Albrecht <address@hidden>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> maybe Lily should not give a ‘no viable initial configuration found: may
> not find good beam slope’ warning if the user has already taken care of the
> problem through the Beam’s positions property:
>
> \version "2.19.32"
> {
>   \stemUp g'8-\offset positions #'(-1 . .3) [ \stemDown e'']
> }
>
> (Yes, the example doesn’t make much sense.)
> Wishful thinking?


Perhaps, but you won't get it if you don't ask. I (Ralph) do not know how
to discriminate between problems with easy vs. difficult solutions, so I'm
adding this as Issue #4692 :
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4692/
Ralph