[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Multiple beams too close to noteheaD
From: |
Urs Liska |
Subject: |
Re: Multiple beams too close to noteheaD |
Date: |
Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:43:50 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 |
Am 01.02.2016 um 10:15 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
>> Attached you'll find examples for three and four beams, and I expect
>> this to continue with more beams. I have colored the ones too close
>> in red and adjusted them (blue) to Gould's minimum distance.
> Thanks for your analysis, to which I agree in general. However, I
> consider some of your beam distances unnecessarily too far away from
> the center. For example, in the second line, 8th beam group (note
> `a'): The topmost staff line should touch the lowest beam at the top,
> not at the bottom. There are similar situations in other lines.
>
OK, what I printed in blue are the examples Gould gives as correct
distances for three beams.
However, inferring from what she says about *two* beams and that a third
beam should be attached to the outside one would have to say the
"correct" distance would be to have the innermost beam *center* on the
line. That is: with the note a' the inner beam should center around the
topmost staff line, hanging below that line would be considered too close.
However, setting Stem.details.beamed-lengths to any value I don't
achieve that to inspect it visually. It seems that the beam quanting
code prevents that.
Urs
> Werner