[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: vergessenes Auflösungszeiche (Fehler in LP?)
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: vergessenes Auflösungszeiche (Fehler in LP?) |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Feb 2016 11:54:22 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Erich Meyer <address@hidden> writes:
>> I'm not top posting.
>
> I tried in a small LP - script to locate an error
>
> \version "2.18.2"
>
> pitchGlyphs =
> #`(
> (-37291/100003 . "accidentals.flat") ; Gb
> ( 8798/100003 . "") ; G
> )
>
> accidentalGlyphs =
> #`(
> (-37291/100003 . "accidentals.natural") ; Gb
> ( 8798/100003 . "accidentals.natural") ; G
> )
[...]
> \layout {
> \context {
> \Score
> \override Accidental.glyph-name-alist = \pitchGlyphs
> \override AccidentalCautionary.glyph-name-alist = \accidentalGlyphs
> }}
So in summary: you state to LilyPond that you never want to see an
accidental before a natural G and you complain that you see no
accidental before a natural G. You also state that any cautionary
accidental should look like a natural. Good thing that your example
does not contain a cautionary Gb.
> \score {
> \new Voice {\time 2/2 ges'2 g'| ges'2 g'! | ges'2 g'? }
> \layout {}
> \midi {}
> }
>
> this renders to
>
> http://www.kielnet.net/home/erich.meyer/fehlersuche.png
>
> As you can see , it is missing in the first two measures the sign in front
> of the G's ; in the third beat is shown a not quite correct sign.
I have no idea why you would expect anything else given your input. Is
there any reason you don't specify a natural for G in either case and a
flat for Gb in either case?
--
David Kastrup