bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: vergessenes Auflösungszeiche (Fehler in LP?)


From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: vergessenes Auflösungszeiche (Fehler in LP?)
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 11:54:22 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux)

Erich Meyer <address@hidden> writes:

>> I'm not top posting.
>
> I tried in a small LP - script to locate an error
>
> \version "2.18.2"
>
> pitchGlyphs =
>   #`(
>       (-37291/100003 . "accidentals.flat")            ; Gb
>       (  8798/100003 . "")                            ; G
>     )
>  
> accidentalGlyphs =
>   #`(
>      (-37291/100003 . "accidentals.natural")  ; Gb
>      (  8798/100003 . "accidentals.natural")  ; G
>     )                

[...]

> \layout {
>   \context {
>     \Score
>     \override Accidental.glyph-name-alist           = \pitchGlyphs
>     \override AccidentalCautionary.glyph-name-alist = \accidentalGlyphs
> }}

So in summary: you state to LilyPond that you never want to see an
accidental before a natural G and you complain that you see no
accidental before a natural G.  You also state that any cautionary
accidental should look like a natural.  Good thing that your example
does not contain a cautionary Gb.

> \score {
>      \new Voice {\time 2/2 ges'2 g'| ges'2 g'! | ges'2 g'? }
>      \layout {}
>      \midi {} 
> }
>
> this renders to
>
> http://www.kielnet.net/home/erich.meyer/fehlersuche.png
>
> As you can see , it is missing in the first two measures the sign in front
> of the G's ; in the third beat is shown a not quite correct sign.

I have no idea why you would expect anything else given your input.  Is
there any reason you don't specify a natural for G in either case and a
flat for Gb in either case?

-- 
David Kastrup



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]