[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mark / Barcheck Bug (#1626) Appearing Again
From: |
Jay Anderson |
Subject: |
Re: Mark / Barcheck Bug (#1626) Appearing Again |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Oct 2016 22:03:16 -0700 |
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Andrew Bernard
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Don't you have to provide an argument for \mark, I thought?
>
> I am not familiar with 2.18.2, but in 2.19.48 you do:
Yep. I think \mark requiring an argument explains the errors in the
examples fully:
- The first error it saying that the argument you gave to \mark was wrong
- Lilypond kept trying to make sense of things and kept processing.
Since the argument to \mark was already used there is now 1 too few
beats in that measure.
I think lilypond is behaving as expected here. You might be trying to
do \mark \default or \mark "C" instead.
-----Jay Anderson