[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: articulations above ledger lines
From: |
James Lowe |
Subject: |
Re: articulations above ledger lines |
Date: |
Tue, 06 Feb 2018 18:30:08 +0000 (GMT) |
Hello,
On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 15:47:45 +0000, Gilberto Agostinho <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> According to Elaine Gould's /Behind Bars/, articulations should not
> obscure ledger lines. I believe this is quite justifiable as though we
> want them as close as possible to the note heads for quick recognition,
> they make pitch identification much more difficult when many ledger
> lines are in use. At the moment, in order to avoid this the user is
> required to manually correct the output, see code below:
>
>
> \version "2.19.81"
>
> \markup{"articulations shouldn't obscure the ledger lines"}
>
> {
> \override Beam.auto-knee-gap = #14
> c''''8 e-^ e-. e-!
> }
>
> \markup{"a better solution be"}
>
> {
> \override Beam.auto-knee-gap = #14
> c''''8
> \override Script.Y-offset = #-2.5
> e-^ e-. e-!
> }
>
> Producing: https://s17.postimg.org/uduuvy2ov/lily.png
>
> If anyone would like to take a look at the mentioned passage of Gould's
> book, I will be happy to send a photograph of that page.
>
> Best wishes,
> Gilberto
We have a number of issue already about what looks similar to this - basically
Leger lines colliding with 'stuff'.
E.g
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/3219/
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5020/
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/3141/
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/706/
etc.
Is this just one of these in another form?
Regards
James