[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: comment bug
From: |
Sven Axelsson |
Subject: |
Re: comment bug |
Date: |
Sat, 26 May 2018 20:09:00 +0200 |
On 26 May 2018 at 18:46, bb <address@hidden> wrote:
> The essential point: The case of nested block comments is not mentioned
> in the manual. (Or I cannot find it?)
>
It most certainly is. Section 1.2.2 in the learning manual states that:
"A block comment marks a whole section of music input as a comment.
Anything that is enclosed in %{ and %} is ignored. However, block comments
do not ‘nest’. This means that you cannot place a block comment inside
another block comment. If you try, the first %} will terminate both block
comments."
--
Sven Axelsson
++++++++++[>++++++++++>+++++++++++>++++++++++>++++++
>++++<<<<<-]>++++.+.++++.>+++++.>+.<<-.>>+.>++++.<<.
+++.>-.<<++.>>----.<++.>>>++++++.<<<<.>>++++.<----.
- comment bug, bb, 2018/05/26
- Re: comment bug, Andrew Bernard, 2018/05/26
- Re: comment bug, Urs Liska, 2018/05/26
- Re: comment bug, bb, 2018/05/26
- Re: comment bug, bb, 2018/05/26
- Re: comment bug, Urs Liska, 2018/05/26
- Re: comment bug, bb, 2018/05/26
- Re: comment bug, Urs Liska, 2018/05/26
- Re: comment bug,
Sven Axelsson <=
- Re: comment bug, bb, 2018/05/26
- Re: comment bug, bb, 2018/05/26
- Re: comment bug, David Kastrup, 2018/05/26