Re: Too short crescendo mark when it is supposed to end on a note after a bar

[Johannes Ammon]

Hi Pierre,

thank you for your quick clarification!
Having the to-barline property set by default seems a bit unintuitive to
me. (I have to admit not being an experienced typographer, so it might
be just me.) Do you know any background on why it is done this way?

Thank you for your help, Johannes

Am 08.07.18 um 11:25 schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider:
> Hi Johannes,
> This is not a bug; see:
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/spanners.html#using-the-line_002dspanner_002dinterface
> 
> (go to "The to-barline property").
> 
> Ex.
> 
> \version "2.18"
> \relative c' {
>   c4\< c\! c c-\tweak to-barline #f \< | c\! c c c\< | c c\! c c
> }
> 
> should work as you expected.
> Cheers,
> Pierre
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 2018-07-08 10:12 GMT+02:00 Johannes Ammon <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>>:
> 
>     Hello,
> 
>     when a crescendo mark is supposed to end on a note after a bar, it ends
>     before the bar. Here an example with the resulting image in the
>     attachment:
> 
>     \version "2.18.2"
>     \relative c' {
>       c4\< c\! c c\< | c\! c c c\< | c c\! c c
>     }
> 
>     The second hairpin should be as long as the first one, but it ends at
>     the bar. This problem occurs only when the (de-)crescendo should end on
>     a note right after a bar. The third hairpin has the right length, it
>     ends on the second note after a bar.
>