Re: Fingering inside staff

[Valentin Villenave]

On 5/29/20, Pierre Perol-Schneider <pierre.schneider.paris@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Simone,
> A basic solution:
> \relative c' {
>   \stemUp
>   \override Fingering.staff-padding = #'()
>   <c-1 e-2 g-3 b-5>4 <g'-\tweak extra-offset #'(-.1 . -4.3) -0>8 <g'>
> }

Sure there are workarounds, but: shouldn’t we be treating this as a
bug? There’s no obvious reason why unsetting staff-padding should be
ignored on a beamed note and not on an unbeamed note.

%%%%

\relative c' {
    \stemUp
    \override Fingering.staff-padding = #'()
    <c-1 e-2 g-3 b-5>4 <g'-0>8
}

\relative c' {
    \stemUp
      \override Fingering.staff-padding = #'()
      <c-1 e-2 g-3 b-5>4 <g'-0>8 <g'>
}

%%%%

I can’t find a glyph small enough to trigger it with other grobs
(a.k.a StringNumber, Script or anything else), so I can’t tell if it’s
limited to fingerings.

Cheers,
-- V.