[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j
From: |
Paul Smith |
Subject: |
Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:29:09 -0400 |
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 11:01 -0400, David Boyce wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 1:46 PM, David Boyce <address@hidden> wrote:
> > So I've made a proof-of-concept patch
> > against 3.82.90 which seems to work without that overhead and my
> > question is, would this be of interest towards 3.83?
>
> Ping?
>
> The original patch attachment was made by hand using "diff -u" and I
> had some trouble applying it myself. So here's a version created with
> "cvs -q diff -uN" which should work better.
I've looked at it and as a concept I don't have too many issues with it
(although I'd like to hear from the ports) but I think there some
outstanding issues that should be considered.
One example: I think saving stdout and stderr to different files and
then printing them separately is problematic; consider if your recipe
prints lots of information lines, with errors (to stdout) interspersed.
If you throw all the errors to the end you lose a lot of context.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Smith <address@hidden> Find some GNU make tips at:
http://www.gnu.org http://make.mad-scientist.net
"Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist
- patch to support output synchronization under -j, David Boyce, 2011/04/12
- Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, David Boyce, 2011/04/14
- Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j,
Paul Smith <=
- Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/14
- Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Paul Smith, 2011/04/14
- Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, David Boyce, 2011/04/14
- Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, David Boyce, 2011/04/14
- Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/15
- Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, David Boyce, 2011/04/15
- Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/15
- Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, David Boyce, 2011/04/15
- Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, David Boyce, 2011/04/19
- Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j, David Boyce, 2011/04/19