[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Some serious issues with the new -O option
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Some serious issues with the new -O option |
Date: |
Wed, 01 May 2013 22:33:56 +0300 |
> From: Paul Smith <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 14:41:25 -0400
>
> If you want different behavior you can change your rule to use "+" on
> the two echo lines, so that they're also considered recursive and not
> saved up.
If I do that, the echo from rec1 and rec2 mix up:
D:\gnu\make-3.82.90_GIT_2013-05-01>gnumake -f mkfsync3 -j -O
start rec2start <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
rec1 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
gnumake -f mkfsync simple
gnumake -f mkfsync simple
Is this also expected?
Anyway, my mental model of what's going on under -O is now completely
shattered. I cannot understand what good is this behavior:
> entire recipe and print it at the end, EXCEPT that output from a
> recursive line is not saved: that's the entire point of this feature, to
> allow sub-makes to show their output as they go.
Why is it important to make that exception? And shouldn't we have an
option _not_ to make such an exception, but without -Omake,
i.e. without waiting for the whole session to end? Whenever any
top-level recipe finishes, it is flushed to the screen as a single
unit. Does this make sense?
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse, (continued)
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/05/04
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse, Paul Smith, 2013/05/05
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/05/05
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse, Paul Smith, 2013/05/05
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/05/05
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse, David Boyce, 2013/05/05
- Message not available
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse (was: Re: Some serious issues with the new -O option), Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/05
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse (was: Re: Some serious issues with the new -O option), Paul Smith, 2013/05/05
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse (was: Re: Some serious issues with the new -O option), Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/05
- Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse (was: Re: Some serious issues with the new -O option), Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/06
- Re: Some serious issues with the new -O option,
Eli Zaretskii <=