[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another issue with -O?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Another issue with -O? |
Date: |
Fri, 03 May 2013 16:16:50 +0300 |
> From: Paul Smith <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 08:57:57 -0400
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> I think having this facility built into make is a win, especially as
> parallel builds become predominant. I would be even more happy about it
> if we can get it to the point where it can be enabled by default, and
> users don't even have to worry about it.
I think enabling it by default will be a no-brainer if/when we come up
with a way to get it to produce the same output as without -j. IOW,
run a parallel build, but output its results as if it were a
non-parallel build.
- Another issue with -O?, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/02
- Re: Another issue with -O?, Paul Smith, 2013/05/02
- Re: Another issue with -O?, Reinier Post, 2013/05/03
- Re: Another issue with -O?, Paul Smith, 2013/05/03
- Re: Another issue with -O?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Another issue with -O?, Tim Murphy, 2013/05/03
- Re: Another issue with -O?, Paul Smith, 2013/05/03
- Re: Another issue with -O?, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/04
- Re: Another issue with -O?, Paul Smith, 2013/05/04
- Re: Another issue with -O?, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/05/04
- Re: Another issue with -O?, David Boyce, 2013/05/03
- Re: Another issue with -O?, Edward Welbourne, 2013/05/04