Re: math expressions (was: Re: Tail call elimination)

[Pete Dietl]

> I believe the form being considered is:
>
>   $(math OPERATOR,LIST)

I am still partial to `$(math ...)`
with only one argument.

> The only one I'm not sure about is overflow.  That will need some
> thought.  Gnulib contains a comprehensive set of macros to deal with
> overflow, in various ways.

My initial thought was to simply leave it implementation defined, like
C does for signed integers.