[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: disabling the built-in rules
From: |
Paul Smith |
Subject: |
Re: disabling the built-in rules |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Jul 2023 14:35:06 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.48.3 (by Flathub.org) |
On Mon, 2023-07-17 at 19:31 +0200, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Except possibly that POSIX does not allow this? Then we would need a
> pseudo-target the turns off only the non-standardized part of the
> built-in database, say, .NO_GNU_BUILTINS. And users would have to
> write:
>
> .SUFFIXES:
> .NO_GNU_BUILTINS:
I'm not sure what you mean by "POSIX does not allow this". But, POSIX
reserves all targets prefixed with "." (that are not already specified
in the standard) to the implementation. So it's fine with POSIX to add
a pseudo target like .NOBUILTINS; no conforming makefile can use that
target for anything else.
- Re: MAKEFLAGS=-r, (continued)
- Re: MAKEFLAGS=-r, Bruno Haible, 2023/07/17
- Re: MAKEFLAGS=-r, David Boyce, 2023/07/17
- Re: MAKEFLAGS=-r, Bruno Haible, 2023/07/17
- Re: MAKEFLAGS=-r, David Boyce, 2023/07/17
- Re: MAKEFLAGS=-r, Bruno Haible, 2023/07/17
- Re: MAKEFLAGS=-r, Dmitry Goncharov, 2023/07/18
- Re: MAKEFLAGS=-r, Paul Smith, 2023/07/17
- Re: disabling the built-in rules, Bruno Haible, 2023/07/17
- Re: disabling the built-in rules, Paul Smith, 2023/07/17
- Re: disabling the built-in rules, Bruno Haible, 2023/07/17
- Re: disabling the built-in rules,
Paul Smith <=
- Re: disabling the built-in rules, Alejandro Colomar, 2023/07/17
- Re: disabling the built-in rules, Paul Smith, 2023/07/17
- Re: disabling the built-in rules, Dmitry Goncharov, 2023/07/18
- Re: disabling the built-in rules, Alejandro Colomar, 2023/07/19
- Re: disabling the built-in rules, Bruno Haible, 2023/07/17
- Re: MAKEFLAGS=-r, Jeffrey Walton, 2023/07/19
- Re: MAKEFLAGS=-r, Dmitry Goncharov, 2023/07/19
- Re: MAKEFLAGS=-r, Paul Smith, 2023/07/20
- Re: MAKEFLAGS=-r, Dmitry Goncharov, 2023/07/18
- Re: MAKEFLAGS=-r, Bruno Haible, 2023/07/19