[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: new grotty format
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: new grotty format |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Feb 2002 08:39:59 +0100 (CET) |
> > > FWIW, "ls --color" uses "\33[0m" to restore the original colors.
> >
> > This restores default rendering, resetting bold and underline
> > attributes also. Theoretically, it is possible to use "ESC [ 0 m"
> > only (setting all affected attributes again), but this is an awful
> > hack, causing much more escape sequences.
>
> True, but that hack is better than not being able to restore the
> default colors at all (which happens with too many terminals that
> don't support \033[49m and \033[39m).
Do you mean that I should completely avoid `39m' and `49m', using only
`0m'? Or shall this become an option (urgh)?
Werner
- Re: [Groff] Re: new grotty format, (continued)
Re: new grotty format, Karl Berry, 2002/02/10
- Re: new grotty format, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/10
- Re: new grotty format, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/10
- Re: new grotty format, Werner LEMBERG, 2002/02/11
- Re: new grotty format, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/11
- Re: new grotty format, Werner LEMBERG, 2002/02/12
- Re: new grotty format, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/12
- Re: new grotty format,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: new grotty format, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/13
- Re: new grotty format, Werner LEMBERG, 2002/02/13
Re: new grotty format, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/24