[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bookmarks for concept index
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: bookmarks for concept index |
Date: |
13 May 2002 15:56:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) |
| It is clean, agreed, but pushes too much on the writers IMHO.
|
| On the writers? I thought it would be *easier* for the writers. Then
| they don't have to know what versions go with what questionable features.
Harder: they can't just simply AC_PREREQ the version they use: they
have to track what features are new. I'm not even referring to the
cleanups: someday, you will want to remove the @require, but then, which ones?
AC_PREREQ is also cleaner, imho, as it does not spread into the
document, just its prologue.
PS/ You may rename AC_PREREQ if it doesn't fall in the Autotexinfo
conventions :)
Re: bookmarks for concept index, Karl Berry, 2002/05/06
Re: bookmarks for concept index, Karl Berry, 2002/05/09
Re: bookmarks for concept index, Karl Berry, 2002/05/12
- Re: bookmarks for concept index,
Akim Demaille <=
Re: bookmarks for concept index, Karl Berry, 2002/05/13