[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Regression with gdb.texinfo
From: |
José Fonseca |
Subject: |
Re: Regression with gdb.texinfo |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Nov 2002 02:46:42 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 07:31:00PM -0500, Karl Berry wrote:
> - Simply do not try to break the index terms.
>
> I think this would be best, because there's no guarantee that a comma in
> the index entry means a secondary index entry. We need to add real
> multi-level indexing support to Texinfo, not kludge it up with text
> analysis.
That's perfectly reasonable.
> Is this easy to change? If not, I'd like to go ahead and make the
> release even with this bug -- at least there's been a lot of
> improvement, even if it's not perfect :).
See attached. It's an easy change, but relatively big as alot of stuff
isn't needed anymore, so it should be reviewed carefully. Tomorrow
morning I'll run all texinfos to check for regressions.
José Fonseca
makeinfo-docbook-secondary,diff
Description: Text document