[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: imbrications and ---
From: |
Dumas Patrice |
Subject: |
Re: imbrications and --- |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Dec 2003 19:36:13 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
Hi Karl,
> 1) in its present incarnation, texinfo.tex doesn't do nested styles
> (except for some cases of tt + slanted/italic). This is partly because:
> 2) there is no standard bold typewriter font.
That's really bad !!!
> 3) Thus, prompted a previous bug report some time ago, the HTML was
> (painfully) changed so that it did not do nested style stuff either,
> so that the same Texinfo input would produce (closer to) the same
> appearance in HTML and TeX.
I tend to disagree. In my opinion it is the texinfo which is wrong and
should be changed (even though nobody knows when ;), and in the HTML
there should still be nested style.
> 4) I changed @cite recently in texinfo.tex to unconditionally use \sl,
> never \ttsl. I could not imagine when anyone would ever want to have
> book titles printed in typewriter.
Indeed, this was just a random test case. However something like @strong{go
read @cite{a book}} make sense in my opinion.
> 5) Mixing physical and logical markup seems a rather dubious practice
> in general. I'm not sure I want to define what happens when @b is
> mixed with @command, or @cite with @command. The combinations don't
> make logical sense. @b with @i or @t, yes.
I disagree. It seems to me that something like @b{this is a @command{command}}
does make sense. Using @b is bad style but if a command appears in the
bold text then it should be marked as a command. The same for
@i{this is a @command{command}}. I admit that @t mixed with logical markup
is very dubious. And also the reverse, physical within logical style
(@address@hidden command}}) doesn't make much sense.
Anyway I think that in HTML any nesting should be accepted, in my opinion
it is the browser choice to ignore it or not.
> So, I'm not sure what behavior to try to converge to. What do you think?
>
> Although I wouldn't mind doing nested styles by default, that's a big
> change in texinfo.tex and won't happen any time soon.
I am for nested style, maybe with logical ignoring the inner physical styles
in texinfo. I also seems to me that some logical nesting make sense, like
@strong{go read @cite{a book}}, while other don't, like @address@hidden
or @address@hidden book}}.
Taking into account every possibility sounds rather complicated, though...
Pat
- imbrications and ---, Dumas Patrice, 2003/12/08
- Re: imbrications and ---, Karl Berry, 2003/12/08
- Re: imbrications and ---,
Dumas Patrice <=
- Re: imbrications and ---, Akim Demaille, 2003/12/11
- Re: imbrications and ---, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/12/11
- Re: imbrications and ---, Akim Demaille, 2003/12/11
- Re: imbrications and ---, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/12/11
- Re: imbrications and ---, Akim Demaille, 2003/12/11
- Re: imbrications and ---, Dumas Patrice, 2003/12/11
- Re: imbrications and ---, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/12/11
- Re: imbrications and ---, Karl Berry, 2003/12/13
Re: imbrications and ---, Karl Berry, 2003/12/11