[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: @math in manual
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: @math in manual |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:53:45 -0500 |
Hi Patrice,
Your criticisms of the @math documentation are well-founded.
since makeinfo removes matching braces { }.
I never exactly realized that. Seems unfortunate, since then
@math{a^{bc}} comes out ambiguously?!
@-commands are used in @math
True enough. I was thinking of something like @math{\sigma}, where (I
believe) you have to use \sigma and not @sigma, but had neglected to
think about normal Texinfo @-commands.
'it does not try to interpret the mathematics formatting in any special
That wording doesn't seem right, but I can agree with the underlying
point.
What I'd really like to do with @math is support it -- that is, add all
the mathematical symbol commands to Texinfo, super/subscripts
etc. However, that's obviously not going to happen any time soon, so I
agree it'd be good to document what really happens now. I was more or
less intentionally glossing over the details since I knew the whole
command was rather insufficient.
So, please go ahead and prepare a patch, whatever you think works best,
and I'll work on it from there. Thanks very much.
Karl