[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: another serious `texi2dvi -E' bug
From: |
Patrice Dumas |
Subject: |
Re: another serious `texi2dvi -E' bug |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:15:36 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 04:32:13PM -0600, Karl Berry wrote:
>
> Ordinarily I try very hard to preserve backwards compatibility, but in
> this case I don't think it's a problem: a document would both have to
> use @FORMAT (very few day) *and* macros (very few do, in any nontrivial
> way) *and* rely on macro expansion within the @FORMAT -- I suspect the
> intersection of all that is the empty set.
Is it really possible, or wanted? In texi2html (unless I am wrong),
@macros (and @value) are not expanded in @FORMAT. As far as I can tell,
there is no way to escape macro expansion in @FORMAT, that's why it seemed
to me that there should be no macro and value expansion within @FORMAT.
--
Pat
- Re: another serious `texi2dvi -E' bug, (continued)
- Re: another serious `texi2dvi -E' bug, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/11/23
- Re: another serious `texi2dvi -E' bug, Karl Berry, 2008/11/23
- Re: another serious `texi2dvi -E' bug, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/11/24
- Re: another serious `texi2dvi -E' bug, Karl Berry, 2008/11/24
- Re: another serious `texi2dvi -E' bug, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/11/25
- Re: another serious `texi2dvi -E' bug, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/11/25
- Re: another serious `texi2dvi -E' bug, Patrice Dumas, 2008/11/25
- Re: another serious `texi2dvi -E' bug, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/11/25
- Re: another serious `texi2dvi -E' bug, Patrice Dumas, 2008/11/25
- Re: another serious `texi2dvi -E' bug, Karl Berry, 2008/11/25
Re: another serious `texi2dvi -E' bug,
Patrice Dumas <=