[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Contribution
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Contribution |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:29:47 +0200 |
> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:45:21 -0800 (PST)
> From: Michael Witten <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, Jari Aalto <address@hidden>
>
> However, there are essentially 2 related reasons why people contribute
> to any project:
>
> (1) To improve the project.
> (2) To receive recognition and glory.
>
> and in my experience, (1) is not nearly so sweet without (2).
>
> It's simply not fair when a contributor's work is *officially* filed
> under someone else's name
??? How does CVS cause that, exactly? And what do you mean by ``filed
under someone else's name'', anyway? Isn't the contributor's name
spelled out in the ChangeLog entry for the change?
> CVS isn't just outdated technically; it's outdated morally.
I don't know what are you talking about here. Really. Feel free to
explain this attack.