[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug #35395] bad picture path with --html and --without --no-split
From: |
Vincent Belaïche |
Subject: |
[bug #35395] bad picture path with --html and --without --no-split |
Date: |
Sat, 04 Feb 2012 09:37:27 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 5.1; U; fr) Presto/2.10.229 Version/11.60 |
Follow-up Comment #7, bug #35395 (project texinfo):
Salut Patrice and al.,
After some further thoughts my suggestion would be as follows:
- provide a new command line option --link-prefix that allows the user to
force some prefix for relative links
- if the user does not explicitely give some output directory with --output or
-o, then add prefix `../' automatically when the --html w/o --no-split options
are used.
- if the user sets some output directory name with --output=FILE --html, but
w/o --no-split and w/o --link-prefix then do not prepend `../' if FILE has
some path specified, but do prepend `../' if FILE hasn't any path (i.e.
basename extraction does not change FILE)
so:
--html --output=./somedir
won't prepend `../'
but
--html --output=somedir
will prepend `../'
- if the users sets some prefix with --link-prefix, simply use this prefix,
which overrules all the rules above.
If you agree with this proposition, then I can contribute the documentation
update.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?35395>
_______________________________________________
Message posté via/par Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- [bug #35395] bad picture path with --html and --without --no-split, Patrice Dumas, 2012/02/01
- [bug #35395] bad picture path with --html and --without --no-split,
Vincent Belaïche <=
- [bug #35395] bad picture path with --html and --without --no-split, Patrice Dumas, 2012/02/04
- [bug #35395] bad picture path with --html and --without --no-split, Vincent Belaïche, 2012/02/04
- Re: [bug #35395] bad picture path with --html and --without --no-split, Patrice Dumas, 2012/02/04
- Re: [bug #35395] bad picture path with --html and --without --no-split, Karl Berry, 2012/02/04
- Re: [bug #35395] bad picture path with --html and --without --no-split, Patrice Dumas, 2012/02/04
- Re: [bug #35395] bad picture path with --html and --without --no-split, Karl Berry, 2012/02/04
- Re: [bug #35395] bad picture path with --html and --without --no-split, Patrice Dumas, 2012/02/04
- Re: [bug #35395] bad picture path with --html and --without --no-split, Karl Berry, 2012/02/04
- Re: [bug #35395] bad picture path with --html and --without --no-split, Patrice Dumas, 2012/02/04
- Re: [bug #35395] bad picture path with --html and --without --no-split, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/02/04