[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
texi2html oddity on findex/item combination
From: |
Joel Sherrill |
Subject: |
texi2html oddity on findex/item combination |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Feb 2012 16:58:00 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.26) Gecko/20120201 CentOS/3.1.18-1.el6.centos Thunderbird/3.1.18 |
Hi,
Thanks again for the help getting away from texi2www.
We have spotted one oddity in our generated html. We use
this pattern in multiple places where we put @findex before
an @item.
@itemize @bullet
@findex CONFIGURE_MALLOC_STATISTICS
@item @code{CONFIGURE_MALLOC_STATISTICS} is defined when the application
wishes to enable the gathering of more detailed statistics on the
C Malloc Family of routines.
In the generated HTML, there is an extra empty bullet as shown
here:
http://rtems.org/onlinedocs/doc-current/share/rtems/html/c_user/c_user_420.html#Configuring-a-System-Library-Support-Definitions
This is not found in the generated pdf.
We are using texi2html-1.82-6.fc15.noarch which appears
to use the same source for texi2html that other distros are
using. RTEMS has a PR on this but thanks to an OS upgrade,
Bugzilla isn't alive at the moment.
I know we are in the no man's land between "obsolete"
and "new tool not ready" but wanted to pass this along. It
can at least be a test case.
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research& Development
address@hidden On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985
- texi2html oddity on findex/item combination,
Joel Sherrill <=
- Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination, Patrice Dumas, 2012/02/12
- Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination, Joel Sherrill, 2012/02/13
- [SPAM] Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination, Patrice Dumas, 2012/02/13
- Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination, Joel Sherrill, 2012/02/13
- Re: [SPAM] Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination, Karl Berry, 2012/02/13
- [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination, Patrice Dumas, 2012/02/13
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination, Patrice Dumas, 2012/02/15
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination, Karl Berry, 2012/02/15
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination, Patrice Dumas, 2012/02/16
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination, Karl Berry, 2012/02/16