[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination
From: |
Patrice Dumas |
Subject: |
Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:57:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.2i |
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 04:58:00PM -0600, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> @itemize @bullet
> @findex CONFIGURE_MALLOC_STATISTICS
> @item @code{CONFIGURE_MALLOC_STATISTICS} is defined when the application
> wishes to enable the gathering of more detailed statistics on the
> C Malloc Family of routines.
>
> In the generated HTML, there is an extra empty bullet as shown
> here:
>
> http://rtems.org/onlinedocs/doc-current/share/rtems/html/c_user/c_user_420.html#Configuring-a-System-Library-Support-Definitions
Not with
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; fr; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20120131
Iceweasel/3.5.16 (like Firefox/3.5.16)
> can at least be a test case.
It is already a test case, and even though it seems a bit odd, it is
on purpose because without an enclosing <li> </li> the html would not
be valid.
--
Pat
- texi2html oddity on findex/item combination, Joel Sherrill, 2012/02/07
- Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination,
Patrice Dumas <=
- Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination, Joel Sherrill, 2012/02/13
- [SPAM] Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination, Patrice Dumas, 2012/02/13
- Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination, Joel Sherrill, 2012/02/13
- Re: [SPAM] Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination, Karl Berry, 2012/02/13
- [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination, Patrice Dumas, 2012/02/13
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination, Patrice Dumas, 2012/02/15
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination, Karl Berry, 2012/02/15
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination, Patrice Dumas, 2012/02/16
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination, Karl Berry, 2012/02/16
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination, Joel Sherrill, 2012/02/16