Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination

[Joel Sherrill]

On 02/12/2012 06:57 PM, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 04:58:00PM -0600, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > @itemize @bullet
> > @findex CONFIGURE_MALLOC_STATISTICS
> > @item @code{CONFIGURE_MALLOC_STATISTICS} is defined when the application
> > wishes to enable the gathering of more detailed statistics on the
> > C Malloc Family of routines.
> >
> > In the generated HTML, there is an extra empty bullet as shown
> > here:
> >
> > http://rtems.org/onlinedocs/doc-current/share/rtems/html/c_user/c_user_420.html#Configuring-a-System-Library-Support-Definitions
> Not with
> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; fr; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20120131 
> Iceweasel/3.5.16 (like Firefox/3.5.16)
I tried a couple of browsers and they had the extra bullet. Oh well.
> > can at least be a test case.
> It is already a test case, and even though it seems a bit odd, it is
> on purpose because without an enclosing<li>  </li>  the html would not
> be valid.
What's the recommended way to put an index marker on an @item?
Should we place it afterwards?

I don't mind changing our texinfo sources. I just need to know what the
best practice is.

Thanks.

--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research&   Development
address@hidden        On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
    Support Available             (256) 722-9985