[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:10:51 -0800 |
+ we will have an empty bullet with texi2html since it will
never get upgraded.
As I understand it, texi2html will still be updated, more or less. But
not before texinfo, so it doesn't help you.
I could put it on our internal machines that generate the html.
Another, perhaps less-intrusive solution, would be to post-process out
the bullet with sed/perl/whatever.
Of course, any testing against the development version would be
appreciated. I hope we'll make at least a prerelease in the
not-impossibly-distant future ...
Best,
Karl
- [SPAM] Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination, (continued)
- [SPAM] Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination, Patrice Dumas, 2012/02/13
- Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination, Joel Sherrill, 2012/02/13
- Re: [SPAM] Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination, Karl Berry, 2012/02/13
- [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination, Patrice Dumas, 2012/02/13
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination, Patrice Dumas, 2012/02/15
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination, Karl Berry, 2012/02/15
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination, Patrice Dumas, 2012/02/16
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination, Karl Berry, 2012/02/16
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination, Joel Sherrill, 2012/02/16
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination, Patrice Dumas, 2012/02/16
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: texi2html oddity on findex/item combination,
Karl Berry <=