[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: texinfo-4.13.90 pretest available
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: texinfo-4.13.90 pretest available |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Nov 2012 16:26:59 +0200 |
> Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 19:26:38 GMT
> From: address@hidden (Karl Berry)
>
> Finally, the first pretest for the next Texinfo release is available:
>
> ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo-4.13.90.tar.xz
> http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo-4.13.90.tar.xz
I've built this using MinGW. See my other mail about the changes I
needed for that to work.
After building, I tried "make check". This failed in every single
test script (at least the first 40, when I lost patience and
interrupted the run). The reason seems to be that the test suite
requires a non-standard 'mktemp' command. I wrote a clone of such a
command (and then all tests passed), but would it be possible to have
any non-standard commands as part of the distribution in the future?
My next gripe is about the new makeinfo: it seems to be built to only
work from the configured --prefix directory. I did
make install-strip prefix=d:/usr/test
just to test the new version, but makeinfo refused to work from there,
saying:
Can't locate Texinfo/Convert/Texinfo.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
D:\usr\share\texinfo D:/usr/lib D:/usr/site/lib .) at D:\usr\test\bin\\makeinfo
line 128.
(D:/usr is the value of --prefix with which I configured the package.)
Is there any workaround for this? On MS-Windows, it is very customary
to install precompiled binary distributions without building them.
Since there's no standard /usr/local/ tree on Windows, end users
install the packages in all kinds of places, and expect them to "just
work". Is there a way of "relocating" the built package so that its
root is not where --prefix said? If not, would it be possible to
provide such a way in future pretests? If the package is not
relocatable, I'm afraid it will be hated by Windows users.
TIA
- Re: texinfo-4.13.90 pretest available, (continued)
- Re: texinfo-4.13.90 pretest available, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/11/17
- Test results on Debian unstable (was: Re: texinfo-4.13.90 pretest available), Stefano Lattarini, 2012/11/17
- Success on NetBSD 5.1 and Solaris 10 (Re: texinfo-4.13.90 pretest available), Stefano Lattarini, 2012/11/17
- Re: texinfo-4.13.90 pretest available,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: texinfo-4.13.90 pretest available, Patrice Dumas, 2012/11/17
- Re: texinfo-4.13.90 pretest available, Karl Berry, 2012/11/17
- Re: texinfo-4.13.90 pretest available, Patrice Dumas, 2012/11/17
- Re: texinfo-4.13.90 pretest available, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/11/17
- Re: texinfo-4.13.90 pretest available, Patrice Dumas, 2012/11/18
- Re: texinfo-4.13.90 pretest available, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/11/18
- Re: texinfo-4.13.90 pretest available, Patrice Dumas, 2012/11/20
- Re: texinfo-4.13.90 pretest available, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/11/20
- Re: texinfo-4.13.90 pretest available, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/11/17