[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Warn about invalid node names
From: |
Glenn Morris |
Subject: |
Re: Warn about invalid node names |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Aug 2013 13:07:59 -0400 |
Per Bothner wrote (on Mon, 12 Aug 2013 at 09:33 -0700):
> In both cases, Werner is not opposed to warnings - he explicitly
> says he doesn't want to use --no-warn because he wants useful warnings.
>
> The problem is warnings that one can't shut up - he is asking for
> how to rewrite to source to avoid warnings.
Great, then I can find no-one in the archives who really objects to
more warnings (haven't looked _that_ closely though).
> Some people/organizations have a policy (or at least preference) that
> builds be warning-free. This is a good discipline.
I'd like builds to be free of easily caught bugs.
If makeinfo won't help me with that, I'll add a comment to the notes
for making an Emacs release (which are already long enough) to run a
trivial grep to find bad node names.
- Warn about invalid node names, Glenn Morris, 2013/08/07
- Re: Warn about invalid node names, Karl Berry, 2013/08/07
- Re: Warn about invalid node names, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/08/07
- Re: Warn about invalid node names, Glenn Morris, 2013/08/12
- Re: Warn about invalid node names, Patrice Dumas, 2013/08/12
- Re: Warn about invalid node names, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/08/12
- Re: Warn about invalid node names, Patrice Dumas, 2013/08/12
- Re: Warn about invalid node names, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/08/12
- Re: Warn about invalid node names, Patrice Dumas, 2013/08/13
- Re: Warn about invalid node names, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2013/08/13
- Re: Warn about invalid node names, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/08/13