[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: difficulties building from svn, missing help2man, segfault
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: difficulties building from svn, missing help2man, segfault |
Date: |
Thu, 8 May 2014 16:14:15 GMT |
Shouldn't ./configure check for its presence if it's going to be used?
It is not needed by users installing from a release. It is only needed
by people installing from the development sources, who, yes, are
expected to have the current versions of GNU tools installed
(./README-hacking). Although, as you've seen, you can make it work with
other versions. So fine, be happy :).
I don't see a way to check for such things that is a substantive
improvement over the missing script. I think it's unwarranted to add
more complications in configure about "is this a source build vs. a
release build" merely for the sake of a different warning.
karl
- Re: difficulties when building from svn, segfault, backtrace, (continued)
- Re: difficulties when building from svn, segfault, backtrace, Gavin Smith, 2014/05/08
- Re: difficulties when building from svn, segfault, backtrace, Karl Berry, 2014/05/08
- Re: difficulties when building from svn, segfault, backtrace, Benno Schulenberg, 2014/05/09
- Re: difficulties when building from svn, segfault, backtrace, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/05/09
Re: difficulties building from svn, missing help2man, segfault, Karl Berry, 2014/05/07
Re: difficulties building from svn, missing help2man, segfault, Karl Berry, 2014/05/07
Re: difficulties building from svn, missing help2man, segfault, Gavin Smith, 2014/05/07
Re: difficulties building from svn, missing help2man, segfault,
Karl Berry <=