[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: real subscripts and superscripts?
|
From: |
Per Bothner |
|
Subject: |
Re: real subscripts and superscripts? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 01 Dec 2014 16:51:49 -0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 |
On 12/01/2014 04:31 PM, Karl Berry wrote:
The remaining question would be about @sup/@sub outside
of math -- go into math by default, or stay in text? I would be
inclined toward the latter (which is also what texi2any does now).
I think the latter makes most sense: it seems more useful and consistent.
It is maybe *slightly* easier to implement @sup{TEXT} as $^{TEXT}$
rather than \superscript{TEXT} or whatever, but it can't be that difficult
to implement a suitable \superscript macro.
--
--Per Bothner
address@hidden http://per.bothner.com/