bug-texinfo
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: txi-ca.tex missing in texinfo repository


From: Karl Berry
Subject: Re: txi-ca.tex missing in texinfo repository
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 23:52:14 GMT

Walter and all -- first, in txi-ca.tex, it seemed better to use
\dotless{i} than \char16, and also there was an erroneous \char{16} in
one case.

More interestingly, I defined 00b7 in UTF-8, and made the definition (in
Latin 1 too) use \cdot instead of $^.$.  I also defined a bunch more
"easy" characters in the latin blocks, many suboptimally, but that's
what we can do here.

To my eyes, unfortunately, the superscripted period has the better
positioning for Ldot and ldot, but \cdot has the better weight.  I could
play around with kerning and such, but I will await your views on
whether that is worth the trouble.

My simple test file below (for texinfo.tex only, won't go through makeinfo).

Karl

\input texinfo
@setfilename catalan.info

@documentlanguage ca

@node X
@chapter chap

Hello. @xref{X}. @thistitle

@U{013F} @U{0140}

@bye



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]