[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Using iconv in stand-alone info
From: |
Gavin Smith |
Subject: |
Re: Using iconv in stand-alone info |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Dec 2015 10:40:05 +0000 |
On 26 December 2015 at 07:34, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> Perhaps it would be better to put this in the EILSEQ part of the
> switch above. The result should be the same, AFAICT, since EILSEQ is
> the only case when we don't 'continue' or 'return', but having the
> code there makes it more self-explanatory (although some comment might
> still be in order).
I moved that case to the end, so hopefully the code will be clearer.
- Re: Using iconv in stand-alone info, (continued)
- Re: Using iconv in stand-alone info, Gavin Smith, 2015/12/24
- Re: Using iconv in stand-alone info, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/12/25
- Re: Using iconv in stand-alone info, Gavin Smith, 2015/12/25
- Re: Using iconv in stand-alone info, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/12/25
- Re: Using iconv in stand-alone info, Gavin Smith, 2015/12/25
- Re: Using iconv in stand-alone info, Gavin Smith, 2015/12/25
- Re: Using iconv in stand-alone info, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/12/26
- Re: Using iconv in stand-alone info,
Gavin Smith <=