[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: luatex problems with texinfo.tex
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: luatex problems with texinfo.tex |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Dec 2015 16:40:20 -0700 |
Processing the attached document with luatex, I get
I guess we're talking about U+00A7, the section sign, \S in plain.tex?
I suppose something somewhere is overwriting that definition, and we
should \let the plain \S as some other longer name to avoid the problem.
(Plain LuaTeX itself does not redefine \S, but I can easily imagine it
might happen somewhere along the way.)
Of course, that should really be done for all such plain control
sequences used "internally", but life being what it is ... -k
- luatex problems with texinfo.tex, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/12/30
- Re: luatex problems with texinfo.tex,
Karl Berry <=
- Re: luatex problems with texinfo.tex, Gavin Smith, 2015/12/31
- Re: luatex problems with texinfo.tex, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/12/31
- Re: luatex problems with texinfo.tex, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/12/31
- Re: luatex problems with texinfo.tex, Gavin Smith, 2015/12/31
- Re: luatex problems with texinfo.tex, Gavin Smith, 2015/12/31
- Re: luatex problems with texinfo.tex, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/12/31
- Re: luatex problems with texinfo.tex, Gavin Smith, 2015/12/31
- Re: luatex problems with texinfo.tex, Karl Berry, 2015/12/31