bug-texinfo
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: microtype for texinfo


From: Karl Berry
Subject: Re: microtype for texinfo
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 16:43:04 -0600

Patrice, Gavin - I've been talking with my friend Norbert Preining, who
used to be the Debian maintainer of the texlive packages. (He's also one
of the principal maintainers, with me and a couple others, of upstream
TeX Live.)

He confirms that cm-super is not installed as part of the "recommended"
TeX packages. It's 60+mb and that just seemed too big. It's been that
way since 2005 or so and no one has complained. Which surprises me, but
I guess relatively few people use TeX, and relatively few of those would
be cognizant of bitmap vs. outline fonts, and those who are, just
install what's needed.

cm-super-minimal includes only the 10pt ("1000") fonts. That's
something, but not enough for any nontrivial LaTeX document. 

He's willing in principle to suggest that cm-super[-minimal] become part
of the recommended TeX packages, but I'm not sure that is warranted.

If nothing changes, I guess the implication is that microtype should not
be used by default, since the fonts in Debian will not be scalable.
(No idea what other distros do, but Debian is probably enough to be a
stopper.)

If you want any action to be taken, let me know. --thanks, karl.

P.S. I certainly understand not bothering to individually configure each
\usepackage line as I mentioned in passing before, but I surmise it
would be useful to have a way for users to say "replace the entire
default preamble with this string".  Even including the \documentclass.

Since there are a zillion ways to do any particular job in LaTeX, seems
useful to provide a general way to support "ok, if you want to choose
all the packages yourself, you can".



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]