[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest
From: |
Gavin Smith |
Subject: |
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Oct 2022 13:53:12 +0100 |
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 04:42:45PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> It could also be possible to accept more commands in @w without giving a
> warning.
Given that @footnote and @verb don't work properly inside @w and the
using @pxref inside @w isn't something that document authors particularly
want to do, and that the nesting only issues a warning not an error,
so it will not actually break any documents, just warn the authors, then
I think it is fine to keep all the warnings as they are.
Patrice, is there a need for the contain_simple_text flag in
command_data.txt? I see in ParserNonXS.pm other commands have
this hard-coded, e.g. @shortcaption and @math - the same in
Texinfo/XS/parsetexi/parser.c (check_valid_nesting).
It would seem like a simple change to treat @w the same as @shortcaption
and @math here.
- Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest, (continued)
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest, Patrice Dumas, 2022/10/20
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest, Gavin Smith, 2022/10/20
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest, Gavin Smith, 2022/10/20
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest, Patrice Dumas, 2022/10/20
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest, Gavin Smith, 2022/10/20
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest,
Gavin Smith <=
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest, Patrice Dumas, 2022/10/21
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest, Gavin Smith, 2022/10/21
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest, Patrice Dumas, 2022/10/22
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest, Gavin Smith, 2022/10/22
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/10/22