[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: better glyph for U+00B0 (DEGREE SIGN)
From: |
pertusus |
Subject: |
Re: better glyph for U+00B0 (DEGREE SIGN) |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Nov 2022 18:19:10 +0100 |
On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 01:50:04PM +0000, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> > You probably disagree with many renderings of similar characters,
> > then as the rendering is based on math mode, and in many case does
> > not lead to fixed width characters (for U+00AE, U+00B1, U+00B2,
> > U+00B3...).
>
> Well, contrary to the Unicode cmap values I think *this* could be
> improved. Or do you see any technical reason that prevents putting
> these math characters into boxes with a fixed width? It slightly
> complicates the definitions, but it is probably worth the effort.
I have no knowledge regarding anything related to fonts in Texinfo TeX,
maybe Gavin could answer your question.
--
Pat
- better glyph for U+00B0 (DEGREE SIGN), Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/11
- Re: better glyph for U+00B0 (DEGREE SIGN), Gavin Smith, 2022/11/11
- Re: better glyph for U+00B0 (DEGREE SIGN), Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/12
- Re: better glyph for U+00B0 (DEGREE SIGN), Gavin Smith, 2022/11/12
- Re: better glyph for U+00B0 (DEGREE SIGN), Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/12
- Re: better glyph for U+00B0 (DEGREE SIGN), Gavin Smith, 2022/11/12
- Re: better glyph for U+00B0 (DEGREE SIGN), Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/12
- Re: better glyph for U+00B0 (DEGREE SIGN), Gavin Smith, 2022/11/12
- Re: better glyph for U+00B0 (DEGREE SIGN), Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/13
- Re: better glyph for U+00B0 (DEGREE SIGN), Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/13
- Re: better glyph for U+00B0 (DEGREE SIGN), Gavin Smith, 2022/11/13