|
From: | Per Bothner |
Subject: | implementation language [was: library for unicode collation in C for texi2any?] |
Date: | Thu, 12 Oct 2023 10:25:23 -0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1 |
On 10/12/23 02:39, Patrice Dumas wrote:
There is a translation to C of texi2any code going on, for the future, after the next release, mainly for the conversion to HTML in a first step.
I've always thought that C++ is the obvious implementation language for texi2any. The structure of the Perl code is probably a lot easier and cleaner to map into C++ (using classes and simple single inheritance) than to plain C. C++ has a more extensive and useful standard library than C. One data point: Gcc was converted to C++ some years ago. Re-writing texi2any in Perl turns out to have been a mistake; switching to C seems like it would be another mistake. But hey - I'm not the one doing the work. -- --Per Bothner per@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |