[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Event class?
From: |
John Leuner |
Subject: |
Re: Event class? |
Date: |
Fri, 11 May 2001 19:06:36 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.15i |
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 08:20:01PM -0500, Aaron M. Renn wrote:
> Shane Nay (address@hidden) wrote:
> > What's everyones vibe on Classpath's AWT? Would you like to see it fixed?,
> > would a fixed AWT be accepted into the core of GNUClasspath?
>
> Isn't Event a 1.0 class that was obsolted in 1.1? I'm pretty sure I didn't
> implement it.
Sounds unlikely. Surely ActionEvents etc all inherit from Event?
> The AWT code (with a very few exception) has all been banged in by yours
> truly. Paul Fisher also wrote a peer set for GTK+. The Classpath AWT
> is definitely not debugged, so there is a lot of opportunity to improve
> things.
>
> However, the situation is that RMS does not want to relicense the AWT
> code user the same terms as the rest of Classpath (GPL + Exception).
Why not?
John Leuner
- Re: Event class?, (continued)
- Re: Event class?, Bryce McKinlay, 2001/05/11
- AWT work [WAS Re: Event class? ], Brian Jones, 2001/05/11
- Re: Event class?, Tom Tromey, 2001/05/10
- Re: Event class?, Shane Nay, 2001/05/11
- Re: Event class?, Shane Nay, 2001/05/11
- Re: Event class?, Aaron M. Renn, 2001/05/10
- Re: Event class?, Tom Tromey, 2001/05/11
- RE: Event class?, John Keiser, 2001/05/12
- Re: Event class?, Tom Tromey, 2001/05/12
- Licenses (was Event class?), John Leuner, 2001/05/13
- Re: Event class?,
John Leuner <=
- Re: Event class?, Aaron M. Renn, 2001/05/12
- Re: Event class?, John Leuner, 2001/05/13
- Re: Event class?, Shane Nay, 2001/05/13
- Re: Event class?, J. Russell Smyth, 2001/05/14
- Re: Event class?, John Leuner, 2001/05/14
Re: Event class?, Mark Wielaard, 2001/05/10