[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Event class?
From: |
John Leuner |
Subject: |
Re: Event class? |
Date: |
Mon, 14 May 2001 00:01:19 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.15i |
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 06:31:16PM -0500, Aaron M. Renn wrote:
> John Leuner (address@hidden) wrote:
> > On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 08:20:01PM -0500, Aaron M. Renn wrote:
> > > Shane Nay (address@hidden) wrote:
> > > > What's everyones vibe on Classpath's AWT? Would you like to see it
> > > > fixed?,
> > > > would a fixed AWT be accepted into the core of GNUClasspath?
> > >
> > > Isn't Event a 1.0 class that was obsolted in 1.1? I'm pretty sure I
> > > didn't
> > > implement it.
> >
> > Sounds unlikely. Surely ActionEvents etc all inherit from Event?
>
> No. They inhereit from AWTEvent, which is the class that replaced
> Event in 1.1.
Yes, you're right.
So whatever code Shane was compiling needs to be changed to 1.1.
John Leuner
- Re: Event class?, (continued)
- Re: Event class?, Aaron M. Renn, 2001/05/10
- Re: Event class?, Tom Tromey, 2001/05/11
- RE: Event class?, John Keiser, 2001/05/12
- Re: Event class?, Tom Tromey, 2001/05/12
- Licenses (was Event class?), John Leuner, 2001/05/13
- Re: Event class?, John Leuner, 2001/05/11
- Re: Event class?, Aaron M. Renn, 2001/05/12
- Re: Event class?,
John Leuner <=
- Re: Event class?, Shane Nay, 2001/05/13
- Re: Event class?, J. Russell Smyth, 2001/05/14
- Re: Event class?, John Leuner, 2001/05/14
Re: Event class?, Mark Wielaard, 2001/05/10