[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Classpath future?
|
From: |
Aaron M. Renn |
|
Subject: |
Re: Classpath future? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 12 Jul 2001 11:06:47 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
Etienne M. Gagnon (address@hidden) wrote:
> My point is that "embedded systems" are key to Cygnus/RedHat's businessi
> model, not to me.
>
> If I understand correctly (see below), the GPL+Exception was made to allow
> linking with non-free code in the embedded system. Allowing Cygnus/RedHat
> to link non-free code with my contributions in embedded systems is not key
> to "my" business model.
FYI: I don't believe Red Hat actually sells a great deal of embeddable
code itself, rather they sell a commercially supported version of GCC
as a development platforms targeted at companies that do embedded systems
work.
--
Aaron M. Renn (address@hidden) http://www.urbanophile.com/arenn/
- Classpath future?, Etienne M. Gagnon, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Aaron M. Renn, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, John Keiser, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Aaron M. Renn, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Etienne M. Gagnon, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Aaron M. Renn, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Etienne M. Gagnon, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Brian Jones, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Tom Tromey, 2001/07/12
- CNI, Paul Fisher, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Tom Tromey, 2001/07/12
Re: Classpath future?, Jeff Sturm, 2001/07/12