[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Classpath future?
From: |
Jeff Sturm |
Subject: |
Re: Classpath future? |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Jul 2001 18:37:29 -0400 (EDT) |
On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> 2b) Losing copyright/attribution when assigning
Are copyright and attribution really the same? Would it be acceptable to
all parties to have a "contributed by:" clause in a source file, but with
FSF copyright?
Also, the www site could name significant contributors, much as GCC does
now.
Jeff
- Re: Classpath future?, (continued)
- Re: Classpath future?, Etienne M. Gagnon, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Jeff Sturm, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Etienne M. Gagnon, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Jeff Sturm, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Etienne M. Gagnon, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Brian Jones, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Brian Jones, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Tom Tromey, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Mark Wielaard, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Stuart Ballard, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?,
Jeff Sturm <=
- Re: Classpath future?, John Keiser, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Etienne M. Gagnon, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Jeff Sturm, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Tom Tromey, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Jeff Sturm, 2001/07/13
- Re: Classpath future?, Tom Tromey, 2001/07/13
- Re: [Classpath] Re: Classpath future?, C. Scott Ananian, 2001/07/13
- Re: [Classpath] Re: Classpath future?, Brian Jones, 2001/07/13
- Re: [Classpath] Re: Classpath future?, C. Scott Ananian, 2001/07/13
- Re: Classpath future?, Tom Tromey, 2001/07/13