[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: java.lang.Class comment bug
From: |
Patrick Doyle |
Subject: |
Re: java.lang.Class comment bug |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Jul 2001 22:51:47 -0400 (EDT) |
On 26 Jul 2001, John Keiser wrote:
> > Patrick Doyle <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > > According to the J2SE documentation, the name of an array class uses the
> > > name of the element type in "Java signature format". Thus, String[]'s
> > > class should be "[Ljava.lang.String;".
>
> Does our implementation actually do it this way? And how does Sun's
> Java behave? I remember this seeming strange to me when I wrote the
> doc.
It seems that every method that matters is either native or private or
both, and this is one of the vm/reference classes, so the behaviour
appears to be entirely up to the JVM.
I haven't implemented it myself yet, so I can't confirm this for sure.
--
Patrick Doyle
address@hidden